New: Refreshed product demos for Netta IUCLID, Review and Cite. Watch them

Netta Tech
← All products

Netta Review

Study reviews against OECD, ISO & SANCO/SANTE: automated, cited, reviewer-ready.

Netta Review is automated study review for contract research organisations and GLP laboratories. It reviews study plans and reports against OECD and ISO guidelines, and analytical methods against SANCO/SANTE. Every parameter is graded CRITICAL, MINOR or COMPLIANT, with the exact guideline paragraph cited. Around four hours saved on a typical review.

Book a demo

Netta Review

 See how it works →

Output: graded findings

Netta ReviewCompliance findings
Netta Review: graded findings for a study plan, each citing the OECD guideline paragraph
  1. Severity grade
  2. Guideline paragraph cited
  3. What the study plan says
  4. Assessment in plain language
less time per review
~85%
findings without a cited source
0
typical review turnaround
< 15 min

Regulatory scope

  • OECD test guidelines Study plans & reports
  • ISO standards Study plans & reports
  • SANCO / SANTE Analytical method review
  • GLP compliance Good Laboratory Practice framing
  • Study plans & reports Against OECD & ISO
  • Analytical methods Against SANCO/SANTE

How it works

From a folder of study documents to a graded Word review.

  1. Upload the study

    Drop in the study plan, analytical method or final report as PDF or Word. Add the COA, TIDS and any supporting context files so the review sees the full picture.

    1. Study document attached
    2. Guideline to review against
    3. Optional CoA and TIDS

  2. Pick the review mode

    Three purpose-built modes: study plan review, analytical method review, or study report review. Each runs a different checklist: OECD and ISO for study plans and reports, SANCO/SANTE for analytical methods.

    1. Study plan review
    2. Analytical method review
    3. Study report review

  3. Findings graded

    Every parameter returns a finding (CRITICAL, MINOR or COMPLIANT) with the exact guideline paragraph cited as the justification. No opinion without a reference.

    1. Guideline paragraph cited
    2. What the study plan says
    3. Assessment in plain language

  4. Export the Word document

    Download a reviewer-ready .docx with all findings laid out for the study director, the QA lead and the sponsor. Track-changes friendly, ready for the file.

Input: study document and review mode

Netta ReviewNew study review
Netta Review: new study review with the study plan attached, guideline selected and optional CoA and TIDS
  1. Study document attached
  2. Guideline to review against
  3. Optional CoA and TIDS
  1. Study plan review
  2. Analytical method review
  3. Study report review
  1. Guideline paragraph cited
  2. What the study plan says
  3. Assessment in plain language

The reviewer stays in the loop on every finding. Netta Review drafts, the scientist signs off. No finding without a cited guideline paragraph. More consistent than manual review: the system checks every item, every time. No reviewer fatigue, no missed paragraphs.

What gets reviewed

Three review modes for the three documents that matter.

Study plan review

  • Objective and study design coherence
  • Test item identity and stability
  • Test system selection and dosing
  • Observation schedule vs guideline
  • QA and archiving provisions
  • Deviations and justifications

Analytical method review

  • Method scope vs guideline requirements
  • Validation parameters (linearity, LOQ, LOD)
  • Specificity and selectivity
  • Precision and accuracy
  • Stability of analyte
  • System suitability

Final report review

  • Reported results vs protocol
  • Data integrity and traceability
  • Statistical treatment
  • Discussion vs findings
  • Deviations documented and addressed
  • QA statement completeness

Full-picture review

  • Upload supporting documents alongside the study
  • Inconsistencies flagged automatically
  • Every finding cited to its source
  • PDF and Word inputs accepted
  • Mixed-language documents supported
  • Nothing missed because it was in a different file

Deployment

EU-hosted by default. On-premise on request.

Cloud

EU-hosted SaaS

  • Hosted in the European Union
  • LLM inference in EU regions under enterprise DPA
  • Contractual prohibition on training on client data
  • Onboarding within the week

On-premise

Available on request

  • Air-gapped deployment for the most sensitive labs
  • Quoted per engagement. Discuss during the demo
  • Custom integration with your document management system
  • Compatible with hardened environments

Why Netta Review

We didn’t build another study-management platform.

Most tools in this space are end-to-end study-management suites with a review tab buried three menus deep. Netta Review is the review tab: sharp, fast, built for the phase where findings actually matter.

  • Generic end-to-end study management platforms with review bolted on

    Purpose-built for the review phase, nothing to unlearn

  • Pathology-only AI review tools

    Covers the full study document: design, methods, reports

  • Manual checklist consulting priced by the hour

    Runs in minutes, structured output, reproducible across reviewers

  • Tools that cover one guideline family only

    OECD, ISO and SANCO/SANTE in one tool: study plans, reports and analytical methods

  • Opaque AI that confidently invents findings

    Every finding cites the specific guideline paragraph it relies on

Questions

The ones a QA lead asks first.

If yours isn’t here, a 30-minute demo is the fastest way to get it answered. We don’t do gated whitepapers.

Book a demo
Which guidelines does Netta Review cover?
OECD test guidelines and ISO standards for study plans and reports, and SANCO/SANTE guidance for analytical methods. New guidelines are added as ECHA, OECD, ISO and DG SANTE publish them.
Which review types are supported?
Three: pre-study plan review, analytical method review, and final study report review. Each runs a different checklist built for the phase.
What document formats does it accept?
PDF and Word documents. You can attach the study plan together with the certificate of analysis, test item data sheet and any supporting context files in one upload.
How do you prevent errors or invented findings?
Every finding is grounded in a cited paragraph from the applicable guideline (OECD, ISO or SANCO/SANTE). The reviewer sees the citation next to the finding before accepting it. No finding ships without a defensible source.
Where does the data live?
On the SaaS tier, application and LLM inference run in the European Union under contractual terms prohibiting use of your data for model training. On-premise deployment is available on request.
Can guidelines be customised for in-house SOPs?
The shipped guideline catalogue is curated by Netta and updated centrally. Custom SOP checklists can be added for on-premise engagements. Talk to us during the demo.
What does the output look like?
A Word document with one row per parameter, graded CRITICAL, MINOR or COMPLIANT, followed by the cited paragraph and the reviewer-ready justification. Ready to drop straight into the file.
How long is onboarding?
Production within the week on the SaaS tier. On-premise timelines depend on your infrastructure and typically run two to four weeks.

Other products

Get in touch

Ready to see it work on your documents?

Book a 30-minute call. No slides. We run your real documents through the system and you see the output. If it does not save you time, we will tell you.

Book a 30-minute call [email protected]